PDA

View Full Version : 2011 NCAA Football mega thread


usafdarkhorse
08-31-2011, 11:09 PM
Surprised this wasn't a thread yet...UNTIL NOW.

Predictions?

I'm still pulling for my Vols. Hopefully this year will show alot of improvement. All I want is for Neyland Stadium to be deafening while we stomp LSU this year. That's all I ask.

07SIdan
09-01-2011, 12:50 AM
My rebels are probably gonna see a bunch of ass stompings this year with the sec west being predicted to being so strong this year. But i'm still hopeful but doubtful at the same time. BYU will be our first big challenge on saturday. We'll see how our new offensive coordinator plays it out and our still shaky decision on qb. As of right now I think our game will be strictly run.

satalac
09-01-2011, 03:51 AM
I think Tennessee is going to upset at least two teams this year. I'm liking what Dooley is doing and think the team will continue to improve. The next couple of years will see the return of Tennessee to the top of the SEC East.

Eric_2jz
09-01-2011, 06:36 AM
I'm going to be on the field this weekend!

Already sold my Terrace tix.

SlowSnake
09-01-2011, 07:54 AM
I think a team under the radar is gonna end up as the BCS Champion. OU: Too many holes on defense. One linebacker died and the other is out for 8 weeks, not to mention a shaky secondary. Bama: Great D, but what about the O? They'll be fine running the ball, but being one dimensional is not a good thing. Oregon: too many scandals to deal with. LSU: See Oregon. Boise State: They could end up in the big game. Outside of Georgia and TCU, they will be heavily favored in every game. However, an undefeated BSU will not get the nod over a 1-2 loss SEC Champ. That's why they use strength of schedule in the rankings.

brokeman's_SR
09-01-2011, 10:00 AM
I think Tennessee is going to upset at least two teams this year. I'm liking what Dooley is doing and think the team will continue to improve. The next couple of years will see the return of Tennessee to the top of the SEC East.

QFT

UT is going to have another tough year or two(but improvements will be seen). With a new coach and young team/little depth, they are definitely going up hill. However, Dooley is sending them in the right direction, with a little time and effort, they will be one of the top contenders again.

nremdn
09-01-2011, 10:15 AM
I think a team under the radar is gonna end up as the BCS Champion. OU: Too many holes on defense. One linebacker died and the other is out for 8 weeks, not to mention a shaky secondary. Bama: Great D, but what about the O? They'll be fine running the ball, but being one dimensional is not a good thing. Oregon: too many scandals to deal with. LSU: See Oregon. Boise State: They could end up in the big game. Outside of Georgia and TCU, they will be heavily favored in every game. However, an undefeated BSU will not get the nod over a 1-2 loss SEC Champ. That's why they use strength of schedule in the rankings.

Boise State is a complete joke. I don't think they should be eligible to play for a national championship until they play a real schedule. I'm so tired of them considered to be a contender every year when they only play maybe 1-2 legit teams a season (when have they ever scheduled a powerhouse during the season?). The day they decide to join a real conference and play a real schedule should be the first day they ever have a chance at competing for a national title.

datpurpledrank
09-01-2011, 10:21 AM
Oregon or gtfo and no I am an actual fan before last year. To many starters returning with probably two heisman candidates on offense and a killer secondary.

Bcs championship Oregon vs bama or another sec team. And bama because defense kills in football

SlowSnake
09-01-2011, 11:00 AM
Boise State is a complete joke. I don't think they should be eligible to play for a national championship until they play a real schedule. I'm so tired of them considered to be a contender every year when they only play maybe 1-2 legit teams a season (when have they ever scheduled a powerhouse during the season?). The day they decide to join a real conference and play a real schedule should be the first day they ever have a chance at competing for a national title.

I agree, you should have to play more than 2 legit temas a year to compete. My beef with BSU is they are still riding on the coat tails of the team that beat OU in the Fiesta Bowl. I bet anyone not an OU fan didn't know there was a receiver (Paul Thompson- who?) who started at QB for OU that year. All Boise State had to do, like anyone other team, was stack the line to stop Adrian Peterson, which they did. Tennessee won the BCS Title back in '99. Should we keep ranking them in the top 10 every year because of their past accomplishments?

There should honestly be no pre-season rankings. Rankings should come out no earlier than week 5. By then, it should be clear who is worthy of receiving a high ranking. It's not gonna happen, though. Pre-season rankings create interest and make money, which is what college football is all about anyways. Why is the SEC glad to have Texas A&M? It's not because of their football, but because of the huge television market in Houston. The SEC schools will be raking in more dough with the Texas viewers and A&M will be "South Carolina Light" of football in the SEC.

nremdn
09-01-2011, 11:14 AM
I agree, you should have to play more than 2 legit temas a year to compete. My beef with BSU is they are still riding on the coat tails of the team that beat OU in the Fiesta Bowl. I bet anyone not an OU fan didn't know there was a receiver (Paul Thompson- who?) who started at QB for OU that year. All Boise State had to do, like anyone other team, was stack the line to stop Adrian Peterson, which they did. Tennessee won the BCS Title back in '99. Should we keep ranking them in the top 10 every year because of their past accomplishments?

There should honestly be no pre-season rankings. Rankings should come out no earlier than week 5. By then, it should be clear who is worthy of receiving a high ranking. It's not gonna happen, though. Pre-season rankings create interest and make money, which is what college football is all about anyways. Why is the SEC glad to have Texas A&M? It's not because of their football, but because of the huge television market in Houston. The SEC schools will be raking in more dough with the Texas viewers and A&M will be "South Carolina Light" of football in the SEC.

I thought UT won the national championship in 1998? Either way, I agree with you. Boise State's schedule that year helped them to win that game. Those tough games take their toll on a team, injuries and just plain wear and tear throughout the season really change the whole team dynamic by years end. The more scrubs you play, the less beat up your team is. OU came into that game way more beat up than Boise State did.

An easy schedule is such an advantage in college football. I don't mind them having that schedule, but don't get upset when you get passed over for a national championship berth. The scary part for me is one of these days (sooner than later i'm afraid) the stars will align and Boise will sneak into a National Championship game with a disgustingly weak schedule and I will lose all hope in the BCS system.

Honestly, I hate the SEC and pretty much every team in it, but they don't shy away from competition and I can respect that. I realize some SEC teams have cupcake schedules, but on the whole they play 3-4 tough tough games a year. Boise State never plays any during the season.

brokeman's_SR
09-01-2011, 01:47 PM
Honestly, I hate the SEC and pretty much every team in it, but they don't shy away from competition and I can respect that. I realize some SEC teams have cupcake schedules, but on the whole they play 3-4 tough tough games a year. Boise State never plays any during the season.

If the SEC did not play inter-conference games, they would own the rankings. The reason you see SEC teams with multiple losses is mainly due to playing against other SEC teams. With all the powerhouse schools such as South Carolina, LSU, Auburn, Bama, GA, UT, FLA, and etc, it causes great teams to be knocked down after playing tough teams week-in and week-out. They do play weaker teams, and not every team in the SEC is tough, but the SEC has been undoubtedly the toughest conference to play in for years because of this. When an SEC team makes it in the top 10, to the championship, or etc, it is saying something. I am not trying to take away from other conferences, because all have their hard teams to play against. However, the SEC has the most competition, the most rivalry, and that is why I like SEC football. Never know what will happen

SlowSnake
09-01-2011, 03:30 PM
Whatever happened to the SEC fans who said all the SEC does is beat each other up? Lately it seems an SEC teams goes undefeated almost every year. Yes, they are winning the big BCS Championship game, but if you listen to "some" SEC fans, those BCS games are being won by a landslide. Most of the games have actually been fairly close. Auburn beats Oregon by 3, Bama beats Texas by 16 (UTs QB knocked out of game after moving the ball at will against the Tide D), Florida beats OU by 10 (Florida's closest win over an SEC school was 11 except for unranked and no SEC school held Florida to less than 30), LSU over Ohio State by 14, and Florida over Ohio State by 27(!!), which is the picture those same fans like to think happens every year when an SEC team plays any other OOC team. The bottom line, whether by 1 or 100, is they won their game. My point is the dominance is just not there like people think. Where the SEC really earns my respect is that there are more teams, due to a smaller gap in talent, that could pull off the upset on any given day. Vanderbilt is the only school I can think of that has no chance to knock off, say, Alabama. This is also a huge help to the SEC champs. They have been conditioned to get up for every game, mentally and physically. Good teams in other conferences have to get up for no more than 3-4 big games a year, if that.

SlowSnake
09-02-2011, 02:39 PM
Boise State just lost a starting receiver, starting safey, and 2nd string D lineman. Now they are acting like the big boys! :D

I think Richt may be looking for another job if his team gets beat in a home game by a short handed BSU team.

nremdn
09-02-2011, 03:46 PM
Boise State just lost a starting receiver, starting safey, and 2nd string D lineman. Now they are acting like the big boys! :D

I think Richt may be looking for another job if his team gets beat in a home game by a short handed BSU team.

I just wish Boise was playing a different SEC team. Georgia is all over the place, never really know what you're going to get with them. Loaded with talent, but always seem to underachieve. I hope they play to their potential and let Boise know they don't belong with the big boys.

SlowSnake
09-02-2011, 04:48 PM
I'm sure alot of the SEC fans feel the same way. You were correct about UT, it was the '98 season when they were BCS Champs.

brokeman's_SR
09-03-2011, 06:22 AM
It's the big day! About fuckin time, and what sucks is games will be limited to watch as I am overseas :/. About to head out and go see what I can catch.

v8subie
09-03-2011, 08:30 AM
TCU vs Baylor; what a fucking game.

DAtIntegra35
09-03-2011, 05:32 PM
I'm really excited about my 'Dores. I am not expecting much as usual, but over the next few years I really think James Franklin will turn this program around and he's already started to with a pretty good recruiting class. I think James Franklin will do more for Vandy football than Bobby Johnson did. And if Larry Smith can have some decent games, we might have a shot at a bowl. I'd love to see us beat UT this year though.

As for National Champion, I'm gonna say either Alabama v. Oregon in the title game with 'Bama winning. All the analyists say this year will be the end of the SEC dominating, but I don't think so. I think Alabama's team on defense is better than their 09 team and once AJ Mccarron gets some more starts and confidence they will be fine. Trenton Richardson is a beast at running back and I see them winning the SEC for sure and going undefeated.

Oregon looks like the same team from a year ago, and I think their only stumbling block could be against USC. Even though it's a home game for the Ducks, USC would love to upset them since they aren't bowl elgible this year.

And I watched the first half of the Notre Dame v. USF game and Notre Dame looked hilariously awful. I love watching them suck every year haha.

M-Technic owner
09-03-2011, 06:09 PM
Ahhhhh fucking rain delay!!

brokeman's_SR
09-04-2011, 02:35 AM
No video stream, no audio stream, no play by play, damn I hate this country. Nice to see UT win but wouldve been nice to actually see what happened.

Out of the few games I did watch, Auburn vs Utah St was the best. US almost had them, they pulled it out of their ass in the last 3 mins

DAtIntegra35
09-04-2011, 03:40 AM
Alright. So where are all the Boise State haters? Let's hear it. Georgia's not a top team, Georgia got screwed, Georgia sucks and shouldn't be ranked, etc etc etc.


Yeah. Boise won. They played a good game. They are in a shitty conference and don't have the chance to play top tier teams every week. They are still a good football team. And they have been the last few years. Do I think they deserve a title shot right now, no, but if they run the table, I'd love to see them get their shot.

Last year they beat I believe VU their first game at a neutral site and then VU went on to lose their next 2 then making that win look not that impressive. Let's see what happens this year. If they run the table, I'd love to see them in the BCS National Title Game.

Discuss...

SlowSnake
09-04-2011, 08:31 AM
If Georgia runs the table, then I think an undefeated Boise State should get a shot at the BCS Championship game. Are they good enough? Yes. Deserving? Fair or not, no. Without a playoff, you gotta look at teams at the top and see what their schedule strength looks like. TCU gave BSU a big shit sammich when they went out and got beat by Baylor. That should push TCU out of the rankings. BSU's credibility relied on having victories over a 2 loss Georgia and a 1 loss TCU. Since TCU screwed that up, Georgia will have to run the table to make up for BSU's weak schedule.

How about the SEC? I didn't think SEC teams lost to OOC teams? They had 2 lose, both at home!!

brokeman's_SR
09-04-2011, 11:31 AM
[QUOTE=SlowSnake;588823How about the SEC? I didn't think SEC teams lost to OOC teams? They had 2 lose, both at home!![/QUOTE]

Can't speak for UGA or Ole Miss, but the rest of the SEC did well(minus Auburn barely pulling it off). I'd really like to see BSU play a harder schedule, it'd be nice to see them in the championship game, everyone loves an underdog team. I just feel they need to earn it. Their win against UGA is a good starting point, but they will have to blow all the lower teams out of the water with high scoring shut-outs to be considered. They need to be brought up into a different conference with more competition, which will either prove that they are worthy, or prove that they don't deserve it because they can't handle a higher level of athleticism.

On another note, which game(s) did you all find most enjoying to watch?
my vote def Utah St @ Auburn, even though I was pissed to see Auburn win, it was a damn good game. The defending champs shouldn't have gotten in that position to begin with, which raises a few questions of how well theyre going to perform when it comes to bigger games

DAtIntegra35
09-04-2011, 12:44 PM
I guess my thing with "they need to be in another conference" is, why? Ohio State played in 1 or 2 BCS title games and looked like high school teams against the SEC teams they played. Oregon got bested last year by Auburn. Just because you put Boise in a "better" or "tougher" conference doesn't mean the competition is better unless they join the SEC. I don't get it. SEC is the toughest conference and puts all the other conferences to shame. The closest is the PAC12 but they aren't there yet.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to sit down and watch a Boise game and the last few years you could say "that's a damn good football team."

As the season goes on, if Boise runs the table they should get a title shot. Weaker conference, easy schedule yada yada yada. How many FBS schools run the table? 2 maybe 3 each year. And that's all division 1 school. Doesn't that tell you something? It ain't easy.

Idk I'm just ready to see Boise in a title game and I think they have a legitimate shot this year. We'll see

Ventolin
09-04-2011, 12:56 PM
I've always been a Texas fan but this was hilarious to me. The Rice band spelled out $EC during halftime, an obvious troll towards the conference re-alignment issues going on right now.

http://i51.tinypic.com/24b6sn5.jpg

Ventolin
09-04-2011, 01:11 PM
Can't speak for UGA or Ole Miss, but the rest of the SEC did well(minus Auburn barely pulling it off).

* Georgia defeated by Boise State
* Ole Miss defeated by BYU
* South Carolina struggled with East Carolina
* Auburn struggled and almost lost to Utah State

Strongest Conference? Sure I can agree with that. I just don't think the SEC is as far ahead of the pack as everyone else seems to think.

rwall7
09-04-2011, 02:02 PM
Ole Miss = SEC punching bag anyway. The only thing they have going for them is the epic raging in the grove.

SlowSnake
09-04-2011, 03:13 PM
* Georgia defeated by Boise State
* Ole Miss defeated by BYU
* South Carolina struggled with East Carolina
* Auburn struggled and almost lost to Utah State

Strongest Conference? Sure I can agree with that. I just don't think the SEC is as far ahead of the pack as everyone else seems to think.

Agree 100%. Everyone around here acts like the SEC is full of "current" BCS Champs. Don't get me wrong, the BCS champ has come from the SEC for the past 5 years, which proves they are the hottest conference when it comes to the BCS Championship game. All you have to do is look at Auburn. As the reigning BCS Champ, they are playing nowhere close to how they were last year. Hell, most Bama fans say the only reason their SEC runner-up team got beat by Utah in the BCS Bowl a few years ago was because they weren't interested in being there. Maybe so, but they still got beat.

I honestly think the reason most fans around here scream, "SEC, SEC, SEC, ...." is because the Vols are going through a tough stretch and it makes them feel good to justify it as playing in a conference that is too tough. Same goes for Ole Miss and other SEC teams that are struggling.

Friends of mine who are Vol fans used to complain that the BCS was unfair because the SEC was too tough and it was impossible to not lose more than 1 game. I recall a few recent SEC teams going undefeated.

I think it's still too early to make predictions about how good teams are at this stage. I'd put LSU at #1 for now. In 2 more weeks, OU travels to FSU. Over the past few years, OU has played horribly in road games. This game will be like the LSU/Oregon game, as far as separating the pretenders and contenders. OU lost all of their secondary from last year and gave up huge passing plays to Tulsa yesterday. They play like that at FSU and FSU will blow them out.

DAtIntegra35
09-04-2011, 07:08 PM
* Georgia defeated by Boise State
* Ole Miss defeated by BYU
* South Carolina struggled with East Carolina
* Auburn struggled and almost lost to Utah State

Strongest Conference? Sure I can agree with that. I just don't think the SEC is as far ahead of the pack as everyone else seems to think.

This isn't midseason. This is, for all intensive purposes, preseason. Once we are in October we'll see how far ahead the SEC is, and this is a down year for the SEC. I think we can all agree on that.

Ventolin
09-04-2011, 07:36 PM
This isn't midseason. This is, for all intensive purposes, preseason. Once we are in October we'll see how far ahead the SEC is, and this is a down year for the SEC. I think we can all agree on that.

Sure, I'll give you that. It is the first weekend and you can't expect everyone to come out with a seasoned team that has already found their groove. My point is the SEC is always strong because two or three teams are always extremely dominant, but when people talk about how strong and tough the SEC is they often overlook the rest of the conference that doesn't play so well in their OOC games.

rwall7
09-04-2011, 08:40 PM
This isn't midseason. This is, for all intensive purposes, preseason. Once we are in October we'll see how far ahead the SEC is, and this is a down year for the SEC. I think we can all agree on that.

*Intents and purposes.

usafdarkhorse
09-05-2011, 02:09 PM
Didn't get to see any of the game, but glad the Vols won. Heard Montana played tough, especially for their first FBS game in a rather hostile environment. Good to see some star freshmen making waves early.

We really need to get the run game going. Hope they pull it together for Cincinnati and Florida especially. Hopefully some pass fear will pull the defense apart and allow Poole and Lane to run.

Anyone know how well we can expect Cincinnati to play? They creamed Austin Peay...but....yeah.

DAtIntegra35
09-05-2011, 03:16 PM
*Intents and purposes.

Damn iphone

SlowSnake
09-05-2011, 04:09 PM
Anyone know how well we can expect Cincinnati to play? They creamed Austin Peay...but....yeah.

Cincy was 4-8 last year breaking in a new coach. My guess is UT by at least 14, but probably much more.

brokeman's_SR
09-06-2011, 03:00 AM
Cincy was 4-8 last year breaking in a new coach. My guess is UT by at least 14, but probably much more.

UT went through the same process last year as well, but you can tell much improvement for this year. I still see UT on top(because I am a die-hard fan), but I think it will be a fairly close game, UT by 7-10. UT will have to crack down on the running game, UC was tearing AP up with it.

brokeman's_SR
09-06-2011, 03:02 AM
* Georgia defeated by Boise State
* Ole Miss defeated by BYU
* South Carolina struggled with East Carolina
* Auburn struggled and almost lost to Utah State

Strongest Conference? Sure I can agree with that. I just don't think the SEC is as far ahead of the pack as everyone else seems to think.

Most teams in the SEC now are primarily lower-classman starters. They are establishing the play makers and feeling things out. Like the one person said, wait til mid season. Also, out of all the teams in the SEC, only two lost, I'll have to check the other conferences and see how that compares:grin:

brokeman's_SR
09-06-2011, 03:23 AM
Make this easy for you guys, broke it down by conference, how many losses on the first week, how many teams played(noted additional teams that didnt play), and how many are ranked. Also at the end noted how many of the losses, if any, were one of their ranked teams.



ACC - 3 losses out of 10 teams that played, 2 off, 2 ranked teams

Big 12- 0 losses, 10 teams, 4 ranked teams

Big East- 0 losses, 8 teams, 1 ranked team

Big 10- 2 losses, 12 teams, 4 ranked teams

Conf USA- 6 losses, 11 teams, 1 off, 0 ranked

INDEP- 2 losses, 4 teams, 1 ranked(lost)

MAC- 5 losses, 12 teams, 0 ranked

MWC- 3 losses, 8 teams, 2 ranked(1 lost)

PAC 12- 4 losses, 12 teams, 3 ranked(1 lost)

SEC- 2 losses, 12 teams, 8 ranked(1 lost)

SUNBELT- 8 losses, 9 teams, 0 ranked

WAC- 6 losses, 7 teams(1 off), 0 ranked



2/3 of the SEC is ranked(pending one team losing rank after 1st week), its obvious whos got the upper hand in conference strength to me. However, it is the beginning of the season, let's see how it unfolds.... I'm ready!

usafdarkhorse
09-06-2011, 10:31 AM
http://s3.amazonaws.com/kym-assets/photos/images/original/000/077/988/my_body_is_ready.png?1287301242

SlowSnake
09-06-2011, 12:25 PM
2/3 of the SEC is ranked(pending one team losing rank after 1st week), its obvious whos got the upper hand in conference strength to me. However, it is the beginning of the season, let's see how it unfolds.... I'm ready!

Not sure Auburn should even be ranked right now, but the SEC still has 7 teams ranked in the top 25. ::venom::

The Conference that will be formally known as the Big XII has 3 teams in the top 8. The PAC-12 will be getting 2 of those teams and the SEC 1. Texas A&M's ranking is definitely not the norm. With only one Big XII Championship won (by 3 points in double OT), I do not see them being a threat to the SEC anytime soon, although they will have some years when they field some good teams, such as the one they have this year. They will be just like South Carolina and Arkansas.

Here's my current top 5:

1. LSU
2. OU
3. Bama
4. FSU
5. Stanford

This is based on who the teams played and how they looked. Even though LSU got outgained by Oregon, they still won by a wide margin over a quality opponent. Not to mention they were shorthanded, but then again, so was Oregon. Can't wait to see OU at FSU next Saturday! The picture will be much clearer by weeks 6-8.

SlowSnake
09-06-2011, 01:39 PM
DAAAAAAAAAAAMN!!!! AP poll just came out. LSU jumped to #2. So what's surprising about the poll? SEC has 6 teams in the top 25. Big XII also has 6, with 2 fewer teams in their conference. It'll be interesting to listen to those I work with today talk about the new rankings, since they love throwing around rankings when it favors their school. I'm sure they'll say things like, "It's early," "Wait until a few weeks," etc. And they would be justified to say so, but they'll look like idiots since they've been tooting their horns about last week's rankings. lol

brokeman's_SR
09-06-2011, 03:16 PM
DAAAAAAAAAAAMN!!!! AP poll just came out. LSU jumped to #2. So what's surprising about the poll? SEC has 6 teams in the top 25. Big XII also has 6, with 2 fewer teams in their conference. It'll be interesting to listen to those I work with today talk about the new rankings, since they love throwing around rankings when it favors their school. I'm sure they'll say things like, "It's early," "Wait until a few weeks," etc. And they would be justified to say so, but they'll look like idiots since they've been tooting their horns about last week's rankings. lol

Yes! lol, preseason rankings are a joke, but that's all you have to go by until about week 4 really. Most teams start off with 1 or 2 slack ass games, then start getting more competition as the season goes on. However, some teams aren't as lucky(LSU v Oregon), placing two high ranked teams against eachother for the 'warm up' game. Like I said, I am ready for the season to press on and see how it unfolds. Going to be a good one like always!

brokeman's_SR
09-10-2011, 09:49 AM
Week 2! Tired of waiting on it to start

DAtIntegra35
09-10-2011, 11:21 PM
Wow what a day. Bama looked good on the road.

Vandy. Wow. My 'Dores are 2-0. James Franklin has big things in store for Vandy. I'm excited for the next few years to see what happens.

Michigan and Notre Dame. Wow. Michigan with the comeback win. Insane.

I'm so glad football is back. It's been a good day for sure.

Oh yeah, the -4 yard punt in the Oregon State game. Awesome.

brokeman's_SR
09-11-2011, 12:32 PM
my highlights:

1. Of course, UT with another victory. D needs to start stepping up a little more, as well as the offensive line on the run game. Bray is kicking ass with his wideouts. Gators next week...

2. Auburn, once more, had to come down to the final seconds? Some championship team... last minute victories are nice every now and then but not every game.

3. Vandy, new coach doing well! Can't wait to see what the rest of the season will look like.

4. South Carolina, need to pick it up, struggling two weeks in a row to get it going. Still ranked and 2-0, but with struggles like that don't know how much longer they will be up there.

5. OSU(buckeyes), came down to the wire as well, D looking good and doing a damn good job to stop that final drive.

v8subie
09-11-2011, 02:23 PM
I won $50 out of the Michigan-Notre Dame and Alabama-Penn State games. I never bet on S. Carolina games because Garcia is a 50/50 QB to me. Some days he's there and some days he's not.

That Mich/ND game nearly broke my heart.

DAtIntegra35
09-11-2011, 05:08 PM
Lol how can you be so tough on Auburn? They lost their star QB and the best defensive lineman in the nation last year. Cam Newton was Auburn. It's not like they returned 22/22 starters.

brokeman's_SR
09-12-2011, 09:14 AM
Lol how can you be so tough on Auburn? They lost their star QB and the best defensive lineman in the nation last year. Cam Newton was Auburn. It's not like they returned 22/22 starters.

Alot of teams lost players, Most SEC teams are running new players or players that have limited experience. I dont expect them to dominate every game(nor do i want them to), but 2 games in a row where it came down to the last minute is not going to do well for them.

nismojunkie
09-12-2011, 09:26 AM
College sports suck.


/thread

rx7 vinnie
09-12-2011, 09:40 AM
Lol you're gonna catch hell for that.

nremdn
09-12-2011, 09:46 AM
Lol you're gonna catch hell for that.

Pretty obvious that was his intention.

rx7 vinnie
09-12-2011, 09:56 AM
Drama, I heart.

brokeman's_SR
09-12-2011, 02:20 PM
College sports suck.


/thread

I'm mad! lol

College football is the only sport I really keep up with. NFL = overpaid babies, basketball, gay, soccer, gay, baseball, gay.... pretty much everything but college football = gay

/rant

usafdarkhorse
09-14-2011, 09:51 PM
*sniff sniff*

Anyone smell that?

Gator tail.

brokeman's_SR
09-15-2011, 08:44 AM
*sniff sniff*

Anyone smell that?

Gator tail.

Going to be a damn good game this weekend, hopefully a big enough win to get UT ranked :hsdance:

DAtIntegra35
09-17-2011, 01:45 PM
If my 'Dores pull off this shut out, I'll be the happiest man alive.

brokeman's_SR
09-19-2011, 12:12 PM
UT - Hunter = fail.... going to be a tougher season now, Rodgers and the other recievers will have to step up

usafdarkhorse
10-29-2011, 01:56 PM
It is still great to be a Tennessee Vol.