Jose-Aka-Pedro said:well when a dsm beats the Titan supra,
its a sad day. lol
John shep is faster in the 1/4 than the Titan Supra which runs a 7.71 (And shep didnt use his nos)
DSM>2jz
jdmpwr07 said:Seriously...you are gay.
Stock crank:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=im1oKedOV4s
Just to stir up this thread a bit.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCHAoSa4x2g
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulWs3aBrl7U
As far as not being as fast N/A...seriously Josh...have you lost your judgment? It has 2.7 more liters (LS1) and 3.0 (LS2) doubling the engine size. The 2JZ is a damn 15 year old motor. Why don't you just go compare some apples to some grapefruits.
2JZ is the 2nd gen JZ engine, and the JZ engines were the replacement for the M-engines - which were around since the mid 60scountrydave said:lsX is based off the 350 sbc which has been around since the mid 60's :roll:
lsx> 2jz
PWNED.venom_5 said:2JZ is the 2nd gen JZ engine, and the JZ engines were the replacement for the M-engines - which were around since the mid 60scountrydave said:lsX is based off the 350 sbc which has been around since the mid 60's :roll:
lsx> 2jz
so whats your point cuntrydave?
Lol, true I would not drive almost any of the cars it comes in. Maybe a Z06(C5 or C6) withGood2GetBlown said:Only bad thing, everything the lsx comes stock in sucks...
i just put that out there because i new you would have something to put in here........venom_5 said:2JZ is the 2nd gen JZ engine, and the JZ engines were the replacement for the M-engines - which were around since the mid 60scountrydave said:lsX is based off the 350 sbc which has been around since the mid 60's :roll:
lsx> 2jz
so whats your point cuntrydave?
id rock the new zr1 8)Good2GetBlown said:there are a FEW C6's I would rock... I dont mind them, I'm just not a big vette fan...