Tennessee Car Forums at TennSpeed banner
1 - 20 of 42 Posts

·
Drives
Joined
·
3,052 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
The LSx pwns the 2J w its N/A power and don't even get me started when boosted.

OH LSx, I LOVEEE YOUU


LSx nutswinger for.....a few days

LOL

Discuss about how much better the LSx series is the best?
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
2,239 Posts
fuck a 2jz pos paperweight son bitch pile o monkey nuts there useless, there about as gay as a miate with hubcap spinners with barney driving
 

·
OG founder
Joined
·
5,386 Posts
well when a dsm beats the Titan supra,
its a sad day. lol
John shep is faster in the 1/4 than the Titan Supra which runs a 7.71 (And shep didnt use his nos)
DSM>2jz
 

·
No LS...no care
Joined
·
4,414 Posts

·
No LS...no care
Joined
·
4,414 Posts
Jose-Aka-Pedro said:
well when a dsm beats the Titan supra,
its a sad day. lol
John shep is faster in the 1/4 than the Titan Supra which runs a 7.71 (And shep didnt use his nos)
DSM>2jz


Sorry...had to do it.

What DSM is it? Talon...Evo? Wouldn't really surprise me...AWD PWNS from a launch. Now take it out on the freeway and report back to me.
 

·
Super Moderhater
Joined
·
12,366 Posts
PT Cruiser > *

aint that right, adler?
 

·
a.k.a tripleJr35
Joined
·
1,940 Posts
jdmpwr07 said:
Seriously...you are gay.

Stock crank:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=im1oKedOV4s

Just to stir up this thread a bit.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCHAoSa4x2g

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulWs3aBrl7U

As far as not being as fast N/A...seriously Josh...have you lost your judgment? It has 2.7 more liters (LS1) and 3.0 (LS2) doubling the engine size. The 2JZ is a damn 15 year old motor. Why don't you just go compare some apples to some grapefruits.

that second vid is funny as fuuuuuck
 

·
Super Moderhater
Joined
·
12,366 Posts
countrydave said:
lsX is based off the 350 sbc which has been around since the mid 60's :roll:
lsx> 2jz
2JZ is the 2nd gen JZ engine, and the JZ engines were the replacement for the M-engines - which were around since the mid 60s

so whats your point cuntrydave?
 

·
Drives
Joined
·
3,052 Posts
Discussion Starter · #14 ·
Lol, both a wonderful engines, who in their right mind would not want either motor
 

·
No LS...no care
Joined
·
4,414 Posts
venom_5 said:
countrydave said:
lsX is based off the 350 sbc which has been around since the mid 60's :roll:
lsx> 2jz
2JZ is the 2nd gen JZ engine, and the JZ engines were the replacement for the M-engines - which were around since the mid 60s

so whats your point cuntrydave?
PWNED.

Honestly...both are some of my favorite engines. You really can't go wrong with either.
 

·
Drives
Joined
·
3,052 Posts
Discussion Starter · #17 ·
Good2GetBlown said:
Only bad thing, everything the lsx comes stock in sucks...
Lol, true I would not drive almost any of the cars it comes in. Maybe a Z06(C5 or C6) with
a fully done custom interior. That interior/fit & finish is not very good
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,782 Posts
venom_5 said:
countrydave said:
lsX is based off the 350 sbc which has been around since the mid 60's :roll:
lsx> 2jz
2JZ is the 2nd gen JZ engine, and the JZ engines were the replacement for the M-engines - which were around since the mid 60s

so whats your point cuntrydave?
i just put that out there because i new you would have something to put in here........
 
1 - 20 of 42 Posts
Top